Assessing the contribution of cross-sections to the uncertainty of Monte Carlo calculations in micro- and nanodosimetry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Standard

Assessing the contribution of cross-sections to the uncertainty of Monte Carlo calculations in micro- and nanodosimetry. / Villagrasa, Carmen; Bordage, M.; Bueno, M.; Bug, M.; Chiriotti Alvarez, Sabina; Gargioni, E.; Heide, B.; Nettelbeck, E.; Parisi, Alessio; Rabus, Hans.

In: Radiation protection dosimetry, Vol. NCY240, 13.12.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Harvard

Villagrasa, C, Bordage, M, Bueno, M, Bug, M, Chiriotti Alvarez, S, Gargioni, E, Heide, B, Nettelbeck, E, Parisi, A & Rabus, H 2018, 'Assessing the contribution of cross-sections to the uncertainty of Monte Carlo calculations in micro- and nanodosimetry', Radiation protection dosimetry, vol. NCY240. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncy240

APA

Villagrasa, C., Bordage, M., Bueno, M., Bug, M., Chiriotti Alvarez, S., Gargioni, E., Heide, B., Nettelbeck, E., Parisi, A., & Rabus, H. (2018). Assessing the contribution of cross-sections to the uncertainty of Monte Carlo calculations in micro- and nanodosimetry. Radiation protection dosimetry, NCY240. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncy240

Vancouver

Author

Villagrasa, Carmen ; Bordage, M. ; Bueno, M. ; Bug, M. ; Chiriotti Alvarez, Sabina ; Gargioni, E. ; Heide, B. ; Nettelbeck, E. ; Parisi, Alessio ; Rabus, Hans. / Assessing the contribution of cross-sections to the uncertainty of Monte Carlo calculations in micro- and nanodosimetry. In: Radiation protection dosimetry. 2018 ; Vol. NCY240.

Bibtex - Download

@article{38a0c519adeb47fdb89e15dc613b7129,
title = "Assessing the contribution of cross-sections to the uncertainty of Monte Carlo calculations in micro- and nanodosimetry",
abstract = "Within EURADOS Working Group 6 'Computational Dosimetry', the micro and nanodosimetry task group 6.2 has recently conducted a Monte Carlo (MC) exercise open to participants around the world. The aim of this exercise is to quantify the contribution to the uncertainty of micro and nanodosimetric simulation results arising from the use of different electron-impact cross-sections, and hence physical models, employed by different MC codes (GEANT4-DNA, PENELOPE, MCNP6, FLUKA, NASIC and PHITS). Comparison of the participants' simulation results for both micro and nanodosimetric quantities using different MC codes was the first step of the exercise. The deviation between results is due to different cross-sections but also different tracking methods and particle transport cutoff energies. The second step of the exercise will involve using identical cross-section datasets to account only for the other variations in the first step, thus enabling the determination of the uncertainty contribution due to different cross-sections. This paper presents a comparison of the MC simulation results obtained in the first part of the exercise. For the microdosimetric simulations, particularly in the configuration where the electron source is contained within the micrometric target, the choice of MC code has a small influence on the results. For the nanodosimetric results, on the other hand, the mean ionisation cluster size distribution (ICSD) was sensitive to the physical models used in the MC codes. The ICSD was therefore chosen to study the influence of different cross-section data on the uncertainty of simulation results.",
keywords = "microdosimetry, nanodosimetry, Monte Carlo, simulation",
author = "Carmen Villagrasa and M. Bordage and M. Bueno and M. Bug and {Chiriotti Alvarez}, Sabina and E. Gargioni and B. Heide and E. Nettelbeck and Alessio Parisi and Hans Rabus",
note = "Score=10",
year = "2018",
month = dec,
day = "13",
doi = "10.1093/rpd/ncy240",
language = "English",
volume = "NCY240",
journal = "Radioation Protection Dosimitry",
issn = "0144-8420",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

RIS - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing the contribution of cross-sections to the uncertainty of Monte Carlo calculations in micro- and nanodosimetry

AU - Villagrasa, Carmen

AU - Bordage, M.

AU - Bueno, M.

AU - Bug, M.

AU - Chiriotti Alvarez, Sabina

AU - Gargioni, E.

AU - Heide, B.

AU - Nettelbeck, E.

AU - Parisi, Alessio

AU - Rabus, Hans

N1 - Score=10

PY - 2018/12/13

Y1 - 2018/12/13

N2 - Within EURADOS Working Group 6 'Computational Dosimetry', the micro and nanodosimetry task group 6.2 has recently conducted a Monte Carlo (MC) exercise open to participants around the world. The aim of this exercise is to quantify the contribution to the uncertainty of micro and nanodosimetric simulation results arising from the use of different electron-impact cross-sections, and hence physical models, employed by different MC codes (GEANT4-DNA, PENELOPE, MCNP6, FLUKA, NASIC and PHITS). Comparison of the participants' simulation results for both micro and nanodosimetric quantities using different MC codes was the first step of the exercise. The deviation between results is due to different cross-sections but also different tracking methods and particle transport cutoff energies. The second step of the exercise will involve using identical cross-section datasets to account only for the other variations in the first step, thus enabling the determination of the uncertainty contribution due to different cross-sections. This paper presents a comparison of the MC simulation results obtained in the first part of the exercise. For the microdosimetric simulations, particularly in the configuration where the electron source is contained within the micrometric target, the choice of MC code has a small influence on the results. For the nanodosimetric results, on the other hand, the mean ionisation cluster size distribution (ICSD) was sensitive to the physical models used in the MC codes. The ICSD was therefore chosen to study the influence of different cross-section data on the uncertainty of simulation results.

AB - Within EURADOS Working Group 6 'Computational Dosimetry', the micro and nanodosimetry task group 6.2 has recently conducted a Monte Carlo (MC) exercise open to participants around the world. The aim of this exercise is to quantify the contribution to the uncertainty of micro and nanodosimetric simulation results arising from the use of different electron-impact cross-sections, and hence physical models, employed by different MC codes (GEANT4-DNA, PENELOPE, MCNP6, FLUKA, NASIC and PHITS). Comparison of the participants' simulation results for both micro and nanodosimetric quantities using different MC codes was the first step of the exercise. The deviation between results is due to different cross-sections but also different tracking methods and particle transport cutoff energies. The second step of the exercise will involve using identical cross-section datasets to account only for the other variations in the first step, thus enabling the determination of the uncertainty contribution due to different cross-sections. This paper presents a comparison of the MC simulation results obtained in the first part of the exercise. For the microdosimetric simulations, particularly in the configuration where the electron source is contained within the micrometric target, the choice of MC code has a small influence on the results. For the nanodosimetric results, on the other hand, the mean ionisation cluster size distribution (ICSD) was sensitive to the physical models used in the MC codes. The ICSD was therefore chosen to study the influence of different cross-section data on the uncertainty of simulation results.

KW - microdosimetry

KW - nanodosimetry

KW - Monte Carlo

KW - simulation

UR - http://ecm.sckcen.be/OTCS/llisapi.dll/open/31820354

U2 - 10.1093/rpd/ncy240

DO - 10.1093/rpd/ncy240

M3 - Article

VL - NCY240

JO - Radioation Protection Dosimitry

JF - Radioation Protection Dosimitry

SN - 0144-8420

ER -

ID: 4765892