Extremity ring dosimetry intercomparison in reference and workplace fields

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Extremity ring dosimetry intercomparison in reference and workplace fields. / Ginjaume, M.; Carinou, E.; Donadille, L.; Jankowski, J.; Rimpler, A.; Sans Merce, M.; Vanhavere, Filip; Denoziere, M.; Daures, J.; Bordy, J.M.; Itie, C.; Covens, P.; Struelens, Lara (Peer reviewer).

In: Radiation protection dosimetry, Vol. 131, No. 1, 30.08.2008, p. 67-72.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

Ginjaume, M, Carinou, E, Donadille, L, Jankowski, J, Rimpler, A, Sans Merce, M, Vanhavere, F, Denoziere, M, Daures, J, Bordy, JM, Itie, C, Covens, P & Struelens, L 2008, 'Extremity ring dosimetry intercomparison in reference and workplace fields', Radiation protection dosimetry, vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 67-72. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncn230

APA

Ginjaume, M., Carinou, E., Donadille, L., Jankowski, J., Rimpler, A., Sans Merce, M., ... Struelens, L. (2008). Extremity ring dosimetry intercomparison in reference and workplace fields. Radiation protection dosimetry, 131(1), 67-72. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncn230

Vancouver

Ginjaume M, Carinou E, Donadille L, Jankowski J, Rimpler A, Sans Merce M et al. Extremity ring dosimetry intercomparison in reference and workplace fields. Radiation protection dosimetry. 2008 Aug 30;131(1):67-72. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncn230

Author

Ginjaume, M. ; Carinou, E. ; Donadille, L. ; Jankowski, J. ; Rimpler, A. ; Sans Merce, M. ; Vanhavere, Filip ; Denoziere, M. ; Daures, J. ; Bordy, J.M. ; Itie, C. ; Covens, P. ; Struelens, Lara. / Extremity ring dosimetry intercomparison in reference and workplace fields. In: Radiation protection dosimetry. 2008 ; Vol. 131, No. 1. pp. 67-72.

Bibtex - Download

@article{36c10cb8d52c46b99bd4dd6b79d744ab,
title = "Extremity ring dosimetry intercomparison in reference and workplace fields",
abstract = "An intercomparison of ring dosemeters has been organised with the aim of assessing the technical capabilities of available extremity dosemeters and focusing on their performance at clinical workplaces with potentially high extremity doses. Twenty-four services from 16 countries participated in the intercomparison. The dosemeters were exposed to reference photon (137Cs) and beta (147Pm, 85Kr and 90Sr/90Y) fields together with fields representing realistic exposure situations in interventional radiology (direct and scattered radiation) and nuclear medicine (99 mTc and 18F). It has been found that most dosemeters provided satisfactory measurements of Hp(0.07) for photon radiation, both in reference and realistic fields. However, only four dosemeters fulfilled the established requirements for all radiation qualities. The main difficulties were found for the measurement of low-energy beta radiation. Finally, the results also showed a general under-response of detectors to 18F, which was attributed to the difficulties of the dosimetric systems to measure the positron contribution to the dose.",
keywords = "Extremity, ring dosimetry, intercomparison, workplace fields",
author = "M. Ginjaume and E. Carinou and L. Donadille and J. Jankowski and A. Rimpler and {Sans Merce}, M. and Filip Vanhavere and M. Denoziere and J. Daures and J.M. Bordy and C. Itie and P. Covens and Lara Struelens",
note = "Score = 10",
year = "2008",
month = "8",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1093/rpd/ncn230",
language = "English",
volume = "131",
pages = "67--72",
journal = "Radioation Protection Dosimitry",
issn = "0144-8420",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Extremity ring dosimetry intercomparison in reference and workplace fields

AU - Ginjaume, M.

AU - Carinou, E.

AU - Donadille, L.

AU - Jankowski, J.

AU - Rimpler, A.

AU - Sans Merce, M.

AU - Vanhavere, Filip

AU - Denoziere, M.

AU - Daures, J.

AU - Bordy, J.M.

AU - Itie, C.

AU - Covens, P.

A2 - Struelens, Lara

N1 - Score = 10

PY - 2008/8/30

Y1 - 2008/8/30

N2 - An intercomparison of ring dosemeters has been organised with the aim of assessing the technical capabilities of available extremity dosemeters and focusing on their performance at clinical workplaces with potentially high extremity doses. Twenty-four services from 16 countries participated in the intercomparison. The dosemeters were exposed to reference photon (137Cs) and beta (147Pm, 85Kr and 90Sr/90Y) fields together with fields representing realistic exposure situations in interventional radiology (direct and scattered radiation) and nuclear medicine (99 mTc and 18F). It has been found that most dosemeters provided satisfactory measurements of Hp(0.07) for photon radiation, both in reference and realistic fields. However, only four dosemeters fulfilled the established requirements for all radiation qualities. The main difficulties were found for the measurement of low-energy beta radiation. Finally, the results also showed a general under-response of detectors to 18F, which was attributed to the difficulties of the dosimetric systems to measure the positron contribution to the dose.

AB - An intercomparison of ring dosemeters has been organised with the aim of assessing the technical capabilities of available extremity dosemeters and focusing on their performance at clinical workplaces with potentially high extremity doses. Twenty-four services from 16 countries participated in the intercomparison. The dosemeters were exposed to reference photon (137Cs) and beta (147Pm, 85Kr and 90Sr/90Y) fields together with fields representing realistic exposure situations in interventional radiology (direct and scattered radiation) and nuclear medicine (99 mTc and 18F). It has been found that most dosemeters provided satisfactory measurements of Hp(0.07) for photon radiation, both in reference and realistic fields. However, only four dosemeters fulfilled the established requirements for all radiation qualities. The main difficulties were found for the measurement of low-energy beta radiation. Finally, the results also showed a general under-response of detectors to 18F, which was attributed to the difficulties of the dosimetric systems to measure the positron contribution to the dose.

KW - Extremity

KW - ring dosimetry

KW - intercomparison

KW - workplace fields

UR - http://ecm.sckcen.be/OTCS/llisapi.dll/open/ezp_96101

UR - http://knowledgecentre.sckcen.be/so2/bibref/5695

U2 - 10.1093/rpd/ncn230

DO - 10.1093/rpd/ncn230

M3 - Article

VL - 131

SP - 67

EP - 72

JO - Radioation Protection Dosimitry

JF - Radioation Protection Dosimitry

SN - 0144-8420

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 61215