Intercomparison of active personal dosemeters in interventional radiology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Intercomparison of active personal dosemeters in interventional radiology. / Clairand, Isabelle; Struelens, Lara; Bordy, Jean-Marc; Daures, Josiane; Debroas, Jacques; Denozière, Marc; Donadille, Laurent; Gouriou, Jean; Itié, Christian; Vaz, Pedro; d' Errico, Francesco; Vanhavere, Filip (Peer reviewer).

In: Radiation protection dosimetry, Vol. 129, No. 1-3, 24.05.2008, p. 340-345.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harvard

Clairand, I, Struelens, L, Bordy, J-M, Daures, J, Debroas, J, Denozière, M, Donadille, L, Gouriou, J, Itié, C, Vaz, P, d' Errico, F & Vanhavere, F 2008, 'Intercomparison of active personal dosemeters in interventional radiology', Radiation protection dosimetry, vol. 129, no. 1-3, pp. 340-345. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncn083

APA

Clairand, I., Struelens, L., Bordy, J-M., Daures, J., Debroas, J., Denozière, M., ... Vanhavere, F. (2008). Intercomparison of active personal dosemeters in interventional radiology. Radiation protection dosimetry, 129(1-3), 340-345. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncn083

Vancouver

Clairand I, Struelens L, Bordy J-M, Daures J, Debroas J, Denozière M et al. Intercomparison of active personal dosemeters in interventional radiology. Radiation protection dosimetry. 2008 May 24;129(1-3):340-345. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncn083

Author

Clairand, Isabelle ; Struelens, Lara ; Bordy, Jean-Marc ; Daures, Josiane ; Debroas, Jacques ; Denozière, Marc ; Donadille, Laurent ; Gouriou, Jean ; Itié, Christian ; Vaz, Pedro ; d' Errico, Francesco ; Vanhavere, Filip. / Intercomparison of active personal dosemeters in interventional radiology. In: Radiation protection dosimetry. 2008 ; Vol. 129, No. 1-3. pp. 340-345.

Bibtex - Download

@article{bfe3dacbc8e64fe789627970a916d000,
title = "Intercomparison of active personal dosemeters in interventional radiology",
abstract = "Interventional radiology procedures can be very complex and they can lead to relatively high doses to personnel who stand close to the primary radiation field and are mostly exposed to radiation scattered by the patient. For the adequate dosimetry of the scattered photons, APDs must be able to respond to low-energy [10–100 keV] and pulsed radiation with relatively high instantaneous dose rates. An intercomparison of five APD models deemed suitable for application in interventional radiology was organised in March 2007. The intercomparison used pulsed and continuous radiation beams, at CEA-LIST (Saclay, France) and IRSN (Fontenay-aux-Roses, France), respectively. A specific configuration, close to the clinical practice, was considered. The reference dose, in terms of Hp(10), was derived from air kerma measurements and from the measured and calculated energy distributions of the scattered radiation field. Additional Monte Carlo calculations were performed to investigate the energy spectra for different experimental conditions of the intercomparison. The results of this intercomparison are presented in this work and indicate which APDs are able to provide a correct response when used in the specific low-energy spectra and dose rates of pulsed X-rays encountered in interventional radiology.",
keywords = "Active Personal dosemeters, interventioal radiology",
author = "Isabelle Clairand and Lara Struelens and Jean-Marc Bordy and Josiane Daures and Jacques Debroas and Marc Denozi{\`e}re and Laurent Donadille and Jean Gouriou and Christian Iti{\'e} and Pedro Vaz and {d' Errico}, Francesco and Filip Vanhavere",
note = "Score = 10",
year = "2008",
month = "5",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1093/rpd/ncn083",
language = "English",
volume = "129",
pages = "340--345",
journal = "Radioation Protection Dosimitry",
issn = "0144-8420",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1-3",

}

RIS - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intercomparison of active personal dosemeters in interventional radiology

AU - Clairand, Isabelle

AU - Struelens, Lara

AU - Bordy, Jean-Marc

AU - Daures, Josiane

AU - Debroas, Jacques

AU - Denozière, Marc

AU - Donadille, Laurent

AU - Gouriou, Jean

AU - Itié, Christian

AU - Vaz, Pedro

AU - d' Errico, Francesco

A2 - Vanhavere, Filip

N1 - Score = 10

PY - 2008/5/24

Y1 - 2008/5/24

N2 - Interventional radiology procedures can be very complex and they can lead to relatively high doses to personnel who stand close to the primary radiation field and are mostly exposed to radiation scattered by the patient. For the adequate dosimetry of the scattered photons, APDs must be able to respond to low-energy [10–100 keV] and pulsed radiation with relatively high instantaneous dose rates. An intercomparison of five APD models deemed suitable for application in interventional radiology was organised in March 2007. The intercomparison used pulsed and continuous radiation beams, at CEA-LIST (Saclay, France) and IRSN (Fontenay-aux-Roses, France), respectively. A specific configuration, close to the clinical practice, was considered. The reference dose, in terms of Hp(10), was derived from air kerma measurements and from the measured and calculated energy distributions of the scattered radiation field. Additional Monte Carlo calculations were performed to investigate the energy spectra for different experimental conditions of the intercomparison. The results of this intercomparison are presented in this work and indicate which APDs are able to provide a correct response when used in the specific low-energy spectra and dose rates of pulsed X-rays encountered in interventional radiology.

AB - Interventional radiology procedures can be very complex and they can lead to relatively high doses to personnel who stand close to the primary radiation field and are mostly exposed to radiation scattered by the patient. For the adequate dosimetry of the scattered photons, APDs must be able to respond to low-energy [10–100 keV] and pulsed radiation with relatively high instantaneous dose rates. An intercomparison of five APD models deemed suitable for application in interventional radiology was organised in March 2007. The intercomparison used pulsed and continuous radiation beams, at CEA-LIST (Saclay, France) and IRSN (Fontenay-aux-Roses, France), respectively. A specific configuration, close to the clinical practice, was considered. The reference dose, in terms of Hp(10), was derived from air kerma measurements and from the measured and calculated energy distributions of the scattered radiation field. Additional Monte Carlo calculations were performed to investigate the energy spectra for different experimental conditions of the intercomparison. The results of this intercomparison are presented in this work and indicate which APDs are able to provide a correct response when used in the specific low-energy spectra and dose rates of pulsed X-rays encountered in interventional radiology.

KW - Active Personal dosemeters

KW - interventioal radiology

UR - http://ecm.sckcen.be/OTCS/llisapi.dll/open/ezp_90462

UR - http://knowledgecentre.sckcen.be/so2/bibref/5073

U2 - 10.1093/rpd/ncn083

DO - 10.1093/rpd/ncn083

M3 - Article

VL - 129

SP - 340

EP - 345

JO - Radioation Protection Dosimitry

JF - Radioation Protection Dosimitry

SN - 0144-8420

IS - 1-3

ER -

ID: 358340