Photon energy response of LiF:Mg,Ti (MTS) and LiF:Mg,Cu,P (MCP) thermoluminescent detectors: Experimental measurements and microdosimetric modeling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bibtex - Download

@article{b871865ddafe47eeb33a03c97b16bc0b,
title = "Photon energy response of LiF:Mg,Ti (MTS) and LiF:Mg,Cu,P (MCP) thermoluminescent detectors: Experimental measurements and microdosimetric modeling",
keywords = "Thermoluminescent detectors, Photon energy response, Microdosimetric d(z) model, PHITS",
author = "Alessio Parisi and Jérémie Dabin and Werner Schoonjans and {Van Hoey}, Olivier and Patrice Mégret and Filip Vanhavere",
note = "Score=10",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.05.021",
volume = "163",
pages = "67--73",
journal = "Radiation Physics and Chemistry",
issn = "0969-806X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Photon energy response of LiF:Mg,Ti (MTS) and LiF:Mg,Cu,P (MCP) thermoluminescent detectors: Experimental measurements and microdosimetric modeling

AU - Parisi,Alessio

AU - Dabin,Jérémie

AU - Schoonjans,Werner

AU - Van Hoey,Olivier

AU - Mégret,Patrice

AU - Vanhavere,Filip

N1 - Score=10

PY - 2019/5/14

Y1 - 2019/5/14

N2 - The photon energy response of six thermoluminescent detector types (6LiF:Mg,Ti, 7LiF:Mg,Ti, natLiF:Mg,Ti, 6LiF:Mg,Cu,P, 7LiF:Mg,Cu,P and natLiF:Mg,Cu,P) was studied in the energy range 12–1250 keV by means of irradiations with different γ-ray sources and X-rays. As expected, for both LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P detectors, no significant differences were found between the results of detectors with same dopant concentrations but different lithium isotopic enrichment. On the other hand, the type and concentration of dopants influence the photon energy response of the detectors up to 50%. The obtained results were compared with experimental data from literature showing good agreement. In addition, the recently developed Microdosimetric d(z) Model was employed to assess the photon response of these detectors. For microdosimetric calculations performed in the optimal site size of 40 nm (determined in previous investigations with charged particles), a very good agreement was observed between results of the model and the experimental data with an average relative deviation of 3% and 4% for LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P detectors respectively.

AB - The photon energy response of six thermoluminescent detector types (6LiF:Mg,Ti, 7LiF:Mg,Ti, natLiF:Mg,Ti, 6LiF:Mg,Cu,P, 7LiF:Mg,Cu,P and natLiF:Mg,Cu,P) was studied in the energy range 12–1250 keV by means of irradiations with different γ-ray sources and X-rays. As expected, for both LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P detectors, no significant differences were found between the results of detectors with same dopant concentrations but different lithium isotopic enrichment. On the other hand, the type and concentration of dopants influence the photon energy response of the detectors up to 50%. The obtained results were compared with experimental data from literature showing good agreement. In addition, the recently developed Microdosimetric d(z) Model was employed to assess the photon response of these detectors. For microdosimetric calculations performed in the optimal site size of 40 nm (determined in previous investigations with charged particles), a very good agreement was observed between results of the model and the experimental data with an average relative deviation of 3% and 4% for LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P detectors respectively.

KW - Thermoluminescent detectors

KW - Photon energy response

KW - Microdosimetric d(z) model

KW - PHITS

UR - http://ecm.sckcen.be/OTCS/llisapi.dll/open/34635105

U2 - 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.05.021

DO - 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2019.05.021

M3 - Article

VL - 163

SP - 67

EP - 73

JO - Radiation Physics and Chemistry

T2 - Radiation Physics and Chemistry

JF - Radiation Physics and Chemistry

SN - 0969-806X

ER -

ID: 5324869