Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned?

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature reviewpeer-review

Standard

Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned? / Belmans, Niels; Oenning, Anne Caroline Costa; Salmon, Benjamin; Baselet, Bjorn; Tabury, Kevin; Lucas, Stéphane; Lambrichts, Ivo; Moreels, Marjan; Jacobs, Reinhilde; Baatout, Sarah.

In: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Vol. 50, 20210153, 14.05.2021, p. 1-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature reviewpeer-review

Harvard

Belmans, N, Oenning, ACC, Salmon, B, Baselet, B, Tabury, K, Lucas, S, Lambrichts, I, Moreels, M, Jacobs, R & Baatout, S 2021, 'Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned?', Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, vol. 50, 20210153, pp. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20210153

APA

Belmans, N., Oenning, A. C. C., Salmon, B., Baselet, B., Tabury, K., Lucas, S., Lambrichts, I., Moreels, M., Jacobs, R., & Baatout, S. (2021). Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned? Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 50, 1-14. [20210153]. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20210153

Vancouver

Belmans N, Oenning ACC, Salmon B, Baselet B, Tabury K, Lucas S et al. Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned? Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2021 May 14;50:1-14. 20210153. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20210153

Author

Belmans, Niels ; Oenning, Anne Caroline Costa ; Salmon, Benjamin ; Baselet, Bjorn ; Tabury, Kevin ; Lucas, Stéphane ; Lambrichts, Ivo ; Moreels, Marjan ; Jacobs, Reinhilde ; Baatout, Sarah. / Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned?. In: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2021 ; Vol. 50. pp. 1-14.

Bibtex - Download

@article{22f7f0c042834769912637ecb40ec802,
title = "Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned?",
abstract = "Objectives:This review aimed to present studies that prospectively investigated biological effects in patients following diagnostic dentomaxillofacial radiology (DMFR).Methods:Literature was systematically searched to retrieve all studies assessing radiobiological effects of using X-ray imaging in the dentomaxillofacial area, with reference to radiobiological outcomes for other imaging modalities and fields.Results:There is a lot of variability in the reported radiobiological assessment methods and radiation dose measures, making comparisons of radiobiological studies challenging. Most radiological DMFR studies are focusing on genotoxicity and cytotoxicity, data for 2D dentomaxillofacial radiographs, albeit with some methodological weakness biasing the results. For CBCT, available evidence is limited and few studies include comparative data on both adults and children.ConclusionsIn the future, one will have to strive towards patient-specific measures by considering age, gender and other individual radiation sensitivity-related factors. Ultimately, future radioprotection strategies should build further on the concept of personalized medicine, with patient-specific optimization of the imaging protocol, based on radiobiological variables.",
keywords = "Dentomaxillofacial imaging Radiation risk, Genotoxicity, Cytotoxicity",
author = "Niels Belmans and Oenning, {Anne Caroline Costa} and Benjamin Salmon and Bjorn Baselet and Kevin Tabury and St{\'e}phane Lucas and Ivo Lambrichts and Marjan Moreels and Reinhilde Jacobs and Sarah Baatout",
note = "Score=10",
year = "2021",
month = may,
day = "14",
doi = "10.1259/dmfr.20210153",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "1--14",
journal = "Dentomaxillofacial Radiology",
issn = "0250-832X",
publisher = "British Institute of Radiology",

}

RIS - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Radiobiological risks following dentomaxillofacial imaging: should we be concerned?

AU - Belmans, Niels

AU - Oenning, Anne Caroline Costa

AU - Salmon, Benjamin

AU - Baselet, Bjorn

AU - Tabury, Kevin

AU - Lucas, Stéphane

AU - Lambrichts, Ivo

AU - Moreels, Marjan

AU - Jacobs, Reinhilde

AU - Baatout, Sarah

N1 - Score=10

PY - 2021/5/14

Y1 - 2021/5/14

N2 - Objectives:This review aimed to present studies that prospectively investigated biological effects in patients following diagnostic dentomaxillofacial radiology (DMFR).Methods:Literature was systematically searched to retrieve all studies assessing radiobiological effects of using X-ray imaging in the dentomaxillofacial area, with reference to radiobiological outcomes for other imaging modalities and fields.Results:There is a lot of variability in the reported radiobiological assessment methods and radiation dose measures, making comparisons of radiobiological studies challenging. Most radiological DMFR studies are focusing on genotoxicity and cytotoxicity, data for 2D dentomaxillofacial radiographs, albeit with some methodological weakness biasing the results. For CBCT, available evidence is limited and few studies include comparative data on both adults and children.ConclusionsIn the future, one will have to strive towards patient-specific measures by considering age, gender and other individual radiation sensitivity-related factors. Ultimately, future radioprotection strategies should build further on the concept of personalized medicine, with patient-specific optimization of the imaging protocol, based on radiobiological variables.

AB - Objectives:This review aimed to present studies that prospectively investigated biological effects in patients following diagnostic dentomaxillofacial radiology (DMFR).Methods:Literature was systematically searched to retrieve all studies assessing radiobiological effects of using X-ray imaging in the dentomaxillofacial area, with reference to radiobiological outcomes for other imaging modalities and fields.Results:There is a lot of variability in the reported radiobiological assessment methods and radiation dose measures, making comparisons of radiobiological studies challenging. Most radiological DMFR studies are focusing on genotoxicity and cytotoxicity, data for 2D dentomaxillofacial radiographs, albeit with some methodological weakness biasing the results. For CBCT, available evidence is limited and few studies include comparative data on both adults and children.ConclusionsIn the future, one will have to strive towards patient-specific measures by considering age, gender and other individual radiation sensitivity-related factors. Ultimately, future radioprotection strategies should build further on the concept of personalized medicine, with patient-specific optimization of the imaging protocol, based on radiobiological variables.

KW - Dentomaxillofacial imaging Radiation risk

KW - Genotoxicity

KW - Cytotoxicity

UR - https://ecm.sckcen.be/OTCS/llisapi.dll?func=ll&objId=44879021&objAction=download&viewType=1

U2 - 10.1259/dmfr.20210153

DO - 10.1259/dmfr.20210153

M3 - Literature review

VL - 50

SP - 1

EP - 14

JO - Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

JF - Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

SN - 0250-832X

M1 - 20210153

ER -

ID: 7164687