Rethinking Vulnerability Analysis and Governance with Emphasis on a Participatory Approach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Authors

Institutes & Expert groups

Documents & links

DOI

Abstract

This paper draws on vulnerability analysis as it emerged as a complement to classical risk analysis, and it aims at exploring its ability of nurturing risk and vulnerability governance actions. An analysis of the literature on vulnerability analysis allows us to formulate a threefold critique: first, vulnerability analysis has been treated separately in the natural and the technological hazards fields. This separation prevents vulnerability to unleash the full range of its potential, as it constraints appraisals into artificial categories and thus already closes down the outcomes of the analysis. Second, vulnerability analysis focused on assessment tools that are mainly quantitative, whereas qualitative appraisal is a key to assessing vulnerability in a comprehensive way and to informing policy-making. Third, a systematic literature review of case studies reporting on participatory approaches to vulnerability analysis allows us to argue that participation has been important to address the above, but it remains too closed down in its approach and would benefit from embracing a more open, encompassing perspective. Therefore, we suggest rethinking vulnerability analysis as one part of a dynamic process between opening-up and closing-down strategies, in order to support a vulnerability governance framework.

Details

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)129-141
JournalRisk Analysis
Volume35
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2015

Keywords

  • Vulnerability Analysis, Participation, Governance

ID: 300377