Safer-than: making nuclear waste disposal more familiar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Standard

Safer-than: making nuclear waste disposal more familiar. / Hietala, Marika.

In: Science as Culture, 21.01.2021, p. 1-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Author

Bibtex - Download

@article{f76c0444e0b545e3969ed29a1758ac0b,
title = "Safer-than: making nuclear waste disposal more familiar",
abstract = "Geological disposal has been proposed as the solution for managing the most radioactive nuclear wastes. These wastes stay hazardous for periods better measured in geological rather than human time. This challenges the capacity of science to accurately predict the future evolution and safety of geological disposal facilities. Thus nuclear waste management organisations, such as the Finnish Posiva, utilise a broad range of historical and cultural evidence and discursive tactics to support their scientific argumentation for the long-term safety of geological disposal. Posiva, for instance, makes its safety case by anchoring its disposal project in broader international scientific settings and engineering practices; by giving the abstract disposal concept form and tangible through mundane objects and spaces and in so doing presenting geological disposal as an extension of the everyday; and finally by juxtaposing the underground and the aboveground to depict the underground as more predictable and knowable, essentially as ‘safer than.’ By invoking and imagining geological disposal through the familiar, Posiva negotiates the limits of scientific knowledge, and undermines the nuclearity of geological disposal to make its case for the implementability, manageability and safety of geological disposal and, crucially, to present geological disposal as the only available option for long-term nuclear waste management.",
keywords = "Nuclear waste, Underground, Safety, The everyday",
author = "Marika Hietala",
note = "Score=10",
year = "2021",
month = "1",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1080/09505431.2021.1872520",
language = "English",
pages = "1--23",
journal = "Science as Culture",
issn = "0950-5431",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis (CRC)",

}

RIS - Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safer-than: making nuclear waste disposal more familiar

AU - Hietala, Marika

N1 - Score=10

PY - 2021/1/21

Y1 - 2021/1/21

N2 - Geological disposal has been proposed as the solution for managing the most radioactive nuclear wastes. These wastes stay hazardous for periods better measured in geological rather than human time. This challenges the capacity of science to accurately predict the future evolution and safety of geological disposal facilities. Thus nuclear waste management organisations, such as the Finnish Posiva, utilise a broad range of historical and cultural evidence and discursive tactics to support their scientific argumentation for the long-term safety of geological disposal. Posiva, for instance, makes its safety case by anchoring its disposal project in broader international scientific settings and engineering practices; by giving the abstract disposal concept form and tangible through mundane objects and spaces and in so doing presenting geological disposal as an extension of the everyday; and finally by juxtaposing the underground and the aboveground to depict the underground as more predictable and knowable, essentially as ‘safer than.’ By invoking and imagining geological disposal through the familiar, Posiva negotiates the limits of scientific knowledge, and undermines the nuclearity of geological disposal to make its case for the implementability, manageability and safety of geological disposal and, crucially, to present geological disposal as the only available option for long-term nuclear waste management.

AB - Geological disposal has been proposed as the solution for managing the most radioactive nuclear wastes. These wastes stay hazardous for periods better measured in geological rather than human time. This challenges the capacity of science to accurately predict the future evolution and safety of geological disposal facilities. Thus nuclear waste management organisations, such as the Finnish Posiva, utilise a broad range of historical and cultural evidence and discursive tactics to support their scientific argumentation for the long-term safety of geological disposal. Posiva, for instance, makes its safety case by anchoring its disposal project in broader international scientific settings and engineering practices; by giving the abstract disposal concept form and tangible through mundane objects and spaces and in so doing presenting geological disposal as an extension of the everyday; and finally by juxtaposing the underground and the aboveground to depict the underground as more predictable and knowable, essentially as ‘safer than.’ By invoking and imagining geological disposal through the familiar, Posiva negotiates the limits of scientific knowledge, and undermines the nuclearity of geological disposal to make its case for the implementability, manageability and safety of geological disposal and, crucially, to present geological disposal as the only available option for long-term nuclear waste management.

KW - Nuclear waste

KW - Underground

KW - Safety

KW - The everyday

UR - https://ecm.sckcen.be/OTCS/llisapi.dll/open/43117531

U2 - 10.1080/09505431.2021.1872520

DO - 10.1080/09505431.2021.1872520

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 23

JO - Science as Culture

JF - Science as Culture

SN - 0950-5431

ER -

ID: 7092211